Structured public comparison
Compare 2 to 5 jurisdictions
Values below are drawn from reviewed law-field-value records, with source references and last review dates preserved in the data model.
| Field | Australia | Brazil | California |
|---|---|---|---|
| in-forceReviewed 15/04/2026 | in-forceReviewed 15/04/2026 | in-forceReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| activeReviewed 15/04/2026 | activeReviewed 15/04/2026 | activeReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| 2014-03-12Reviewed 15/04/2026 | 2020-09-18Reviewed 15/04/2026 | 2023-01-01Reviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| 2024-11-29Reviewed 15/04/2026 | 2023-04-24Reviewed 15/04/2026 | 2023-03-29Reviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| Applies to APP entities and certain overseas organizations carrying on business in Australia.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Applies to processing operations carried out in Brazil or targeting individuals in Brazil.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Applies to covered businesses doing business in California and meeting statutory thresholds.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| Information or an opinion about an identified individual, or an individual who is reasonably identifiable.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Information regarding an identified or identifiable natural person.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Information that identifies, relates to, describes, or could reasonably be linked with a consumer or household.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| Reviewed 15/04/2026 | consent, legal obligation, public task, legitimate interestsReviewed 15/04/2026 | Reviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| 720Reviewed 15/04/2026 | 48Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Immediate / without undue delayReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| Serious or repeated interferences can trigger penalties exceeding AUD 50 million under recent reforms.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Up to 2% of a private legal entity's revenue in Brazil, capped at BRL 50 million per infraction.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Agency enforcement up to $2,500 per violation or $7,500 for intentional or children's-data violations.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | YesReviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| No single cookie law, but consent expectations arise under privacy and marketing guidance.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | Consent is expected for many tracking scenarios, with ANPD guidance evolving.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | No blanket cookie consent rule, but sharing and sale opt-out signals matter.Reviewed 15/04/2026 | |
| NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 | NoReviewed 15/04/2026 |